By Anna Olson
When I look into
the subject of assisted suicide, I find abundant material from the pro-choice
and the pro-life sides – but not much attention by anyone on spiritual
realities. Many on the pro-choice side don’t believe in life after death; they
believe we live a life, the body dies, and that’s it. The pro-life people talk
about God being the only arbiter of life and death but give no information on
how different kinds of death affect the spirit of the person.
I admit my bias
here: I believe in life after death. I have communicated with spirit entities
enough to be assured that my spirit will continue to live on in another
dimension after my physical death. I prefer the word ‘transition’ to ‘death’ to
describe what happens at the end of our earthly life.
I also lean
towards the pro-choice side of the debate even though there are several
downsides to an early exit if we can believe the statements attributed to
spirits, detailed below. I think it’s important for people to make their own
choices, to think it through for themselves how and when they want to die.
Pamela Rae Heath
and Jon Klimo have done a huge amount of work collecting material dealing with
the spiritual side of suicide, which they present in the book, Suicide: What Really Happens in the
Afterlife? Channeled Conversations with the Dead (North Atlantic Books,
2006). Besides assisted suicide, they deal with traditional suicide,
murder-suicide, and suicide bombers. “Suicide by cop” is another form of
suicide that has surfaced in recent years, where a person deliberately provokes
a law enforcement officer to kill him or her.
In Suicide: What Really Happens in the
Afterlife? Heath and Klimo have gathered channeled messages from spirits of
people who died through some form of suicide, and from spirit guides who help
other spirits in the afterlife. (A definition of channeling: a person on earth is
able to converse with the spirit of someone who has died or a spirit guide. The
channeler either writes down what a spirit is saying or speaks into a tape
recorder and then transcribes.)
The channeler’s
prejudices can taint the message. Heath and Klimo do not guarantee accurate
channeling – in fact, in a few places they point out what might be the
channeler’s feelings coming through. In all, I think the authors attempt to
give an overview of the wide range of messages that have come through various
channelers, without being dogmatic as to what the reader should believe. For
example, the authors point out a pronouncement that may have come from the mind
of the channeler rather than from a spirit: “It [euthanasia] is not according
to God’s Laws, and he will not forgive it.”
In Suicide: What Really Happens in the
Afterlife? Heath and Klimo give the source of all their quotes – but here,
for brevity’s sake, I will just give concepts and some quotes.
The spirit
statements vary from acceptance of euthanasia when there is a long period of
physical suffering and lack of a will to live – to regret that something was
lost by an early exit.
One argument
against euthanasia (from the spirit’s point of view) is that it is harder on
the spirit than a natural death. “The euthanasia of terminally ill patients may
be a shock to the system, which causes the soul to have to adjust a great deal
more than would otherwise be necessary.”
Losing
opportunities for emotional growth is another argument against premature death.
Those who leave through suicide or assisted suicide “will experience some
sadness that they let go of the opportunity for learning.” Another spirit says,
“One never really knows until after the fact (when the soul learns the truth of
the situation in the afterlife) whether something valuable was lost with
cutting your suffering short.”
Some are
concerned about their families. “In the case of terminally ill or elderly
persons, some are sick and want to save their families time, money, and
heartache by committing suicide. These people are unaware of the spiritual side
of their actions. Perhaps before coming into the physical plane, family members
set up certain conditions and situations in order to work out their group
karma. Or they needed to experience being of service to the one who is ill.”
(One definition of karma: the cosmic principle according to which each
person is rewarded or punished in one incarnation according to that person's
deeds in the previous incarnation.)
More benefits of
a natural death: “How do we know that a soul didn’t choose to go through an
experience of a fatal illness in order to burn away karma? If we cut short
someone’s natural time on earth, we never know whether something valuable could
have been learned or whether such an experience was necessary to reach a new
spiritual plateau.”
If people opt
out too soon, “one consequence might be that they would lose the opportunity to
practice the suffering that is needed for them to develop greater compassion
for others.”
We need to feel
useful and it’s painful if we don’t. “Part of the trauma [of being on life
support] being that when the pattern for that life is over, why should the
physical instrument [the body] be maintained? When the time of purposefulness
has ended, then there is a certain vacuum, a certain lack, in that which lies
ahead, and prolongation of the physical instrument is a painful process, part
of the pain being its purposelessness.”
One person’s
illness is another person’s chance to provide care. “There can be a long
terminal illness, which may be an opportunity to experience the love of others
in the care given, and the progressive love of society providing care. [It’s
important] to judge each case individually.”
One spirit
pointed out that “there is a difference between no longer artificially
prolonging life – hence allowing a natural death to occur – and an act of
euthanasia performed because a person is old and tired and finding life hard.”
Heath and Klimo
note: “But once passed, these souls insist that is was necessary, both for us
and for them, that the spiritual lesson of pain and suffering prior to passing
be learned. A loved one in the hereafter says they would gladly endure their
pain again to gain the same reward in the hereafter. They also acknowledge that
no matter how bad things got, all of it was necessary for the completion of
their lessons on the earth. ‘If I had to do it again to get the same reward
here, I would in a heartbeat’” (communicated by the spirit of a young woman who
died of scleroderma, a very painful skin condition).
*
* *** * *
The above are
concepts to consider when thinking about assisted suicide for oneself or a
loved one. Watching a loved one go through a long, agonizing death can be very
painful. But perhaps the dying person and the caregivers gain something on the
emotional and spiritual side that they weren’t aware of at the time.
It’s interesting
that loss of dignity rates highest in a Dutch study (1991) that asked patients
requesting euthanasia to give their reasons (quoted by Heath and Klimo). Here
is a breakdown of their answers: loss of dignity (57 percent); pain (46
percent); pain, when it is the only reason given (5 percent); when the nature
of one’s dying seems unworthy (46 percent); having to be dependent on others
(33 percent); and being tired of life (23 percent).
Dignity is an
emotional term. It covers being able to sustain one’s normal life, finances,
health, and self-care (bathing and toileting). People have different tolerances
for lack of independence. Some consider it undignified to be dependent on
others for the basics of life and so would rather die early than go through
such an experience. Perhaps if they knew they might benefit spiritually by
waiting for a natural death, they would be willing to go through pain and
discomfort to reach that goal.
The concept of
spirit reaction to assisted suicide (and suicide in general) is fascinating. If
you’re interested in looking into this more deeply, I hope you will read Suicide: What Really Happens in the Afterlife?
by Pamela Rae Heath and Jon Klimo.
Anna Olson is a Winnipeg freelance writer and editor. She can be reached at
annols@mts.net.
2 comments:
I just don't understand why we have to endure so much pain to gain when we get "Home".
It seems so harsh, surely there must be a better way to progress spiritually.
I've come across the same info before about people that have transitioned painfully and say "I would do it all again ten times over for what I have gained here".
I thought we come from a place of pure love and acceptance (Home)
I guess I will remember when I get back and the cosmic amnesia is removed.Bret
That is unholy to allow such suffering for no reason we are aware of especially if you are very young suffering with an incurable disease and your mind is made up that you cant see this forward, god if he is as good as we all think he is should be negotiable, things should be worked out there in some way or another. Why would you punish someone who didn't want to make the choice to begin with rather of not lived like an invalid and like you were before things got bad. Does god beat a dead horse?
Post a Comment